<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strongtalking Squeak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.squeak.org/2006/10/03/strongtalking-squeak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.squeak.org/2006/10/03/strongtalking-squeak/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s new in the world of Squeak</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strongtalk VM for RUBY? &#171; The Weekly Squeak</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2006/10/03/strongtalking-squeak/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strongtalk VM for RUBY? &#171; The Weekly Squeak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2006/10/03/strongtalking-squeak/#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Many of you are following the latest developments in VM technology.  The Strongtalk VM was release as open source by SUN.  There is some discussion about using the Strongtalk VM for Ruby.  Will Ruby be the first language to benefit from Strongtalk&#8217;s Type Feedback optimizations?  Will the VM developers in the Smalltalk community step up to help Strongtalk?  While a path is being forged it would be nice if we could steer it back towards support for Squeak.  Please join the discussion at: http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general     Posted by ronteitelbaum Filed in Smalltalk, Squeak internals [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many of you are following the latest developments in VM technology.  The Strongtalk VM was release as open source by SUN.  There is some discussion about using the Strongtalk VM for Ruby.  Will Ruby be the first language to benefit from Strongtalk&#8217;s Type Feedback optimizations?  Will the VM developers in the Smalltalk community step up to help Strongtalk?  While a path is being forged it would be nice if we could steer it back towards support for Squeak.  Please join the discussion at: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general</a>     Posted by ronteitelbaum Filed in Smalltalk, Squeak internals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

