<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minding Your Business With Smalltalk (Part 1 of 4)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s new in the world of Squeak</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannes Hirzel</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-8910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannes Hirzel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-8910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Rueger says that different &quot;forks&quot; (Croquet, Tweak, Spoon, Scratch, and Sophie) of Squeak have happend. And he thinks it is not good. However it is as easily possible to see this as a sign of a healthy community. I means that Squeak is actually used to produce interesting products. In fact every programmer who wants to come up with an application (the mentioned Squeak variants are all &quot;autohring systems&quot;) has to take a base image of a specific version to build upon. He comes up with a &quot;fork&quot; as soon as he passes on the result of his work. That is the way the image concept works. With commercial Smalltalk versions this is the same but it is not so visible as it is used mostly in in-house applications.

In addition there is an exchange between the different variants of Squeak. Code from various variants of Squeak have been folded back into the main  development branch which is fine.

An interesting interview indeed: The conclusion is that to offer commercial services around Squeak means to offer support (bug fixing) and quality assurance making use of the various code collections openly available. And it seems that a comparatively small company can offer a substantial quality service as the example shows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Rueger says that different &#8220;forks&#8221; (Croquet, Tweak, Spoon, Scratch, and Sophie) of Squeak have happend. And he thinks it is not good. However it is as easily possible to see this as a sign of a healthy community. I means that Squeak is actually used to produce interesting products. In fact every programmer who wants to come up with an application (the mentioned Squeak variants are all &#8220;autohring systems&#8221;) has to take a base image of a specific version to build upon. He comes up with a &#8220;fork&#8221; as soon as he passes on the result of his work. That is the way the image concept works. With commercial Smalltalk versions this is the same but it is not so visible as it is used mostly in in-house applications.</p>
<p>In addition there is an exchange between the different variants of Squeak. Code from various variants of Squeak have been folded back into the main  development branch which is fine.</p>
<p>An interesting interview indeed: The conclusion is that to offer commercial services around Squeak means to offer support (bug fixing) and quality assurance making use of the various code collections openly available. And it seems that a comparatively small company can offer a substantial quality service as the example shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minding Your Business With Smalltalk (Part 3 of 4) &#171; The Weekly Squeak</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-7429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minding Your Business With Smalltalk (Part 3 of 4) &#171; The Weekly Squeak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-7429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] we spoke with Michael Rueger and Steve Hunter. From Michael we found out about the perspective of writing and supporting open [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we spoke with Michael Rueger and Steve Hunter. From Michael we found out about the perspective of writing and supporting open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minding Your Business With Smalltalk (part 2 of 4) &#171; The Weekly Squeak</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minding Your Business With Smalltalk (part 2 of 4) &#171; The Weekly Squeak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] our last article we spoke with Michael [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our last article we spoke with Michael [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.B.</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great! Thanks Ron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Thanks Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plopp en anglais et en français bientôt at #doesNotUnderstand:</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plopp en anglais et en français bientôt at #doesNotUnderstand:]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a commencé une série d&#8217;interview concernant les entreprises utilisant Squeak et Smalltalk. La première interview (publiée sur WeeklySqueak) est celle de Michael Ruger, qui travaille à Impara et qui donne son [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a commencé une série d&#8217;interview concernant les entreprises utilisant Squeak et Smalltalk. La première interview (publiée sur WeeklySqueak) est celle de Michael Ruger, qui travaille à Impara et qui donne son [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Boutin</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl Boutin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes indeed a very good interview. Good job Ron. 

Even though I have been away from Smalltalk and Squeak for a while. I really appreciate keeping up to date with the current development in the field. The Weekly Squeak   RSS feed helps and lead me to this article.

I had neve heard of Plopp and indeed I was surprosed by the look&amp;Feel knowing about the Squeak roots.

I have the hope that the OLPC project will succeed and that with it, Smalltalk will succeed. This could propel this inspiring tool/technology forward on the consciousness of the informatician community.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed a very good interview. Good job Ron. </p>
<p>Even though I have been away from Smalltalk and Squeak for a while. I really appreciate keeping up to date with the current development in the field. The Weekly Squeak   RSS feed helps and lead me to this article.</p>
<p>I had neve heard of Plopp and indeed I was surprosed by the look&amp;Feel knowing about the Squeak roots.</p>
<p>I have the hope that the OLPC project will succeed and that with it, Smalltalk will succeed. This could propel this inspiring tool/technology forward on the consciousness of the informatician community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Teitelbaum</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Teitelbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering that it received a 5 year grant from the National Science Foundation http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/getting-the-message/ 
and is being run by Alan Kay&#039;s group www.VPRI.org I would say that we should see some very interesting developments.  

I have to say that more and more I agree that there is a real problem with the extreme bloat of software and operating systems.  I would be interested what would happen if we could go back to a simple extensible model.  I am currently working with technology in my business that is truly revolutionary.  It is sad when you think about it because this technology is so great that it should already be widely adopted.  The barriers include OS&#039;s, software, and considerable corporate interests that maintain the status quo.

I suggest that you follow these development and OLPC www.laptop.org.  I know I am.

Ron Teitelbaum
President / Principal Software Engineer
US Medical Record Specialists 
www.usmedrec.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that it received a 5 year grant from the National Science Foundation <a href="http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/getting-the-message/" rel="nofollow">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/getting-the-message/</a><br />
and is being run by Alan Kay&#8217;s group <a href="http://www.VPRI.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.VPRI.org</a> I would say that we should see some very interesting developments.  </p>
<p>I have to say that more and more I agree that there is a real problem with the extreme bloat of software and operating systems.  I would be interested what would happen if we could go back to a simple extensible model.  I am currently working with technology in my business that is truly revolutionary.  It is sad when you think about it because this technology is so great that it should already be widely adopted.  The barriers include OS&#8217;s, software, and considerable corporate interests that maintain the status quo.</p>
<p>I suggest that you follow these development and OLPC <a href="http://www.laptop.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.laptop.org</a>.  I know I am.</p>
<p>Ron Teitelbaum<br />
President / Principal Software Engineer<br />
US Medical Record Specialists<br />
<a href="http://www.usmedrec.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.usmedrec.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coke drinker</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coke drinker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 05:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just recently been reading about Coke and it seems *very* promising. What do you think the chances are for such a &quot;dynamic movement&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just recently been reading about Coke and it seems *very* promising. What do you think the chances are for such a &#8220;dynamic movement&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Teitelbaum</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Teitelbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are welcome!  

Thanks for the comment!

Ron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome!  </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milan zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://news.squeak.org/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milan zimmermann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/minding-your-business-with-smalltalk-part-1-of-4/#comment-2566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron, a captivating beginning of a great series! Thanks for working on it, 
Milan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, a captivating beginning of a great series! Thanks for working on it,<br />
Milan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

